|
Very true that there are some irritating simple errors in the book and objects misplaced. Surely could have done with a good editor to reign in some of the more unsupported ideas.
To call the book bunk and the author unqualified in the field is a particularly harsh comment on an easy target. Clearly the book is no scientific paper but would not be alone in that . Hard to argue with NGLES otherwise but I think rejecting value of the positive elements are overreactions that elsewhere you may not find.
|