|
Hi Gary
Sorry for the late reply.
Thanks very much for digging this out. Looks like it’s a good match. I took a look in sky safari and it runs very close though it’s IC3475, not IC3472 which might explain the variance you found.(The time entry I made was definitely spurious and have now learnt a bit more about UTC so thanks).
I will give the other software options a go this week to help me on my learning curve and hopefully match that to what you found ( I do like a good bit of reverse engineering)
David
|