View Single Post
  #19  
Old 21-06-2012, 04:39 PM
Danack (Dan Ackroyd)
Registered User

Danack is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter.M View Post
I dont know about the viability of these fast newts, the secondary is 90mm which is 20% of the area of the primary. So the aperture is only 160mm useable,
While your point stands I think your maths is a little off, and it's not quite as bad at that.

200^2 = 40000

90^2 = 8100

40000 - 8100 = 31900 = 178^2

Which is still a significant reduction it's not quite as bad as to 160mm.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CometGuy
So is it f2.8, f2.9 or f3.0?
And is it 8 inches or 200mm?
Reply With Quote