View Single Post
  #7  
Old 16-06-2012, 01:15 PM
Peter.M's Avatar
Peter.M
Registered User

Peter.M is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 953
I dont know about the viability of these fast newts, the secondary is 90mm which is 20% of the area of the primary. So the aperture is only 160mm useable, this makes it a f3.75. It also has 45% central obstruction. I think personally I would prefer the FSQ106 with reducer that gives f3.6, I know the focal length would be shorter but I think it would be the cheaper more reliable option.
Reply With Quote