View Single Post
  #34  
Old 16-08-2014, 12:05 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poita View Post
I don't think any of the Active Optics systems (SBIG or SX) out there truly correct for poor seeing, true Adaptive Optics systems that deform the mirror to cope with poor seeing do a great job, but we won't be seeing those in amatuer astronomy any time soon.

What they can do is correct way faster, with better accuracy and with less momentum shift than mount-motor corrections. This makes them very useful for slightly windy conditions when you couldn't otherwise image, and for where your mount is at the limits of its capability. Both situations are common in our hobby, and AO gives a real benefit.

With crappy seeing however, I just go back inside and catch up on IIS

AO works best when seeing is good, and when seeing is good, that is when you really want to be imaging, so it is a win-win to me.
Good summary Peter, should have just asked you in the first place
regards Ray

Last edited by Shiraz; 16-08-2014 at 01:29 PM.
Reply With Quote