Quote:
Originally Posted by Lognic04
While the tak is good quality I feel like it's more of a visual scope. As lewism has said before, I'd be better off with a modern scope for imaging.
|
Sorry Logan, there is no logic in what you just said. Modern is not necessarily better. If it was true I'd be selling my 16yr old Q and my 14 yr old CN-212. The MT160 is a superb little scope unless there is something dramatically wrong with yours. I think you'll be trading down to a lesser scope by paying the same price and the end results might disappoint you.
