View Single Post
  #47  
Old 20-02-2012, 09:06 AM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
The 17-40mm lens is a baller.

I don't know why people bag it so much. Maybe because its younger and prettier sibling steals the limelight.

As far as I know, the two things going for the 16-35mm are the extra stop of light, and, its magnificent diffraction spikes at sunrise/sunset. The 17-40mm's diffraction spikes are a dog's breakfast.

I use the 17-40mm at f/16 and it is sharp, sharp, sharp.

You're right, Greg; using cheap lenses on a good sensor is like riding a pogo stick when you own a Ferarri. What's the point?

H
Reply With Quote