I can honestly say that I didn't even see this one when you first posted it Michael. Must have disappeared down the list pretty quickly. But now that I have seen it and you are after critique........Interesting shot but way too long of an exposure time leading to most of the stars being small trails ruins the overall effect for me. Now I realise that you probably choose that exposure time to capture the full trail of that great ISS pass (and it does that very well) but it does not work very well for the rest of the elements in the image. Too long for a night scape, and too short to work as a star trail image. If I was wanting to capture something like this I would have taken a continuous series of shorter exposures (with a necessary higher ISO) to keep within the "500/600 Rule", and then combined them to produce the full trail of the ISS, and then I would of masked back in just one of the sub frames, leaving crisp landscape, "static" stars and ISS trail.
Now if you took this idea to the next level and raised your aperture, lowered your ISO even further and went for a much longer exposure time of a few hours (or just stacked multiple ones like this) to produce a fisheye star trail shot, then you would really have my attention
