Can only agree with the comments about videos.. 2 minutes has been tough for me too as I've had to re-edit visuals and music to cut them down. But I also agree with Alex that 2 minutes makes for a short-punchy video and the internet audience does not care for anything much longer.
It prompts the question about the purpose of the category as anything longer than 2 minutes becomes a seriously lengthy video production and hard to compare to animated sequences of other astronomical objects/events which already struggle against the night sky timelapse vids. Tough question.
For info.. if you're struggling to upload large video files you can also contact the organisers (quick!) to send larger file size versions.
Phil
|