View Single Post
  #8  
Old 20-05-2013, 03:12 PM
E_ri_k (Erik)
Registered User

E_ri_k is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lakes Entrance
Posts: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodhound31 View Post
Second one mate. Brilliant.
Baz.
Thanks Baz. The second is the one with more data.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larryp View Post
Yes, the second one. Great work!
Thanks Laurie.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
Great stuff, Erik! I vote for #2 as well.
Thanks Rick
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
The first one has more detail in the galaxy but
the second one has a better background.

That data is so sharp that it's worth reprocessing.
Yeah, I think I over sharpened the first one. I can't seem to pull more detail out of the second one with out making it look crappy. Probably worth another go.
Quote:
Originally Posted by allan gould View Post
Second image for me but what was your processing regime?
Allan
Thanks Allan. I ran DBE, ColourCalibration, Levels, Curves, LHE, Saturation boost, boosted the CIE c* component a little, ACDNR, and a slight unsharp mask. All on the light. Think I backed the levels off a bit on the background.

Quote:
Originally Posted by prokyon View Post
Great work, I prefer number one. The 2nd one has too much contrast I would say.
If I could bend the two maybe. I know what you mean, but I think it's a bit over sharpened, and grainy.

Thanks for looking everyone

Erik
Reply With Quote