Quote:
|
There is a great article on global warming in the March edition of Rolling Stone magazine, the one with the great Neil Young on the cover.
|
Hey, that's unfair. This is a science forum so no dragging God into the equation. (Ok, so I've been a Neil Young fan since I was 15. Now I'm 40. The man rocks, but I'm digressing.).
Back on the subject though, what should the natural levels of CO2 be versus natural plus the man made contributions? I would be very sceptical of any science article published by Rolling Stone.
I'm not at all saying the globe isn't warming, but I've yet to see any valid proof that man made contributions are at all significant.