This is something of a conundrum to answer as we are essentially asking to pick what is better between a copy of a Takahashi mount or a copy of an Astro Physics mount. The problem is that both Tak and AP make superlative mounts but the variables which make them superb are not simply confined to their design but the inherent quality of the ultised materials, the precision in the crafting of their components and thereafter mechanical assembly and finally the fastidious quality control in testing the final product.
This is why the generic EQ6 is about $1.8k and a Tak Temma a bit over $11k. The moment a SW clone becomes close to the Tak is when unfortunately Tak will be out of business as logically we will all buy the clone which is as good for less than half the price. With this general caveat in mind both of the clones are pretty good for what they offer and in the context of a budget mount they will both have their respective strengths and weakness.
If I had to pick between the two I would lean towards the Ioptron simply because there have been a few horror stories about the venerable NEQ6 whereas none thus far that I am aware of about the Ioptron AP clone. However, it is probably only a matter of time before they start to emerge as well
|