View Single Post
  #8  
Old 29-01-2013, 06:26 PM
dvj's Avatar
dvj (John)
Registered User

dvj is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by avandonk View Post
I find it rather miraculous that the non flatness of the RH200 seems to be regulated by your sensor geometry. If it was optic based it would show circular symmetry not quasi rectangular.

Does your sensor have microlenses? I bet it does!

The RH200 has a flat field even far better than specified.

http://d1355990.i49.quadrahosting.co...R_HA_NII_L.jpg

Bert
The KAI 11000 is an interline CCD with microlenses

My point was that flats should not to be ignored. That CCD Inspector image was of multiple test images taken without a flat subtracted. That's what my raw field shows with my STL 11000

An 8300 array is significantly smaller in field coverage. Obviously covering the inner portion of the image circle, nowhere near the edges of the 42mm image circle.

jg
Reply With Quote