View Single Post
  #112  
Old 26-01-2013, 11:59 AM
blink138's Avatar
blink138 (Pat)
Registered User

blink138 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: perth w.a.
Posts: 2,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by adman View Post
Lewis, I could be wrong - but I suspect that it was these comments that raised H's hackles.

The way I see it is that photographers are free to charge whatever they like to shoot weddings, and clients are free to pay that charge or not.

The onus is on the client to do their homework. To have a clear idea of what they are after, to look at photographers portfolios, and maybe contact people they have previously done weddings for, and decide whether they are worth the fee they are asking. And if not, move on.

The flip side of the fee is the clients expectations. I would suggest that clients who pay higher fees will have higher expectations of the quality of not only the delivered product, but also the levels of service given by the photographer before, during, and after the wedding.

It is possible that the reason you find weddings so easy to shoot, is that the fee you are charging, in general, attracts clients with lower expectations. I am not saying that the product you deliver is lower in quality, nor am I trying to denigrate your skill as a photographer (of which I have no knowledge). Setting a low price, then exceeding expectations is certainly one way to create happy clients.

If I buy a chinese $20 cordless drill at bunnings, and it gives up 1 day after its warranty I would be less inclined to raise a stink than if it were my $350 german made equivalent. A poor analogy, but anyway...

Adam
very cleverly and diplomatically put adam!
Reply With Quote