View Single Post
  #4  
Old 02-12-2012, 07:51 PM
lepton3's Avatar
lepton3 (Ivan)
Registered User

lepton3 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shark Bait View Post
..I am not all that familiar with EQ mounts but I assume that level of accuracy is considered the standard for long exposure astro photography.
I need reasonable pointing accuracy because I'm usually using a filter and looking for a faint target (eg not visible until at least 30s exposure at 4x4 bin), so I can't aim by eye. And in any case, if I move the camera, I need to re-take the flats, so that is very inconvenient.

Tracking is a different matter. The mount can't really be used for photography without some form of autoguiding. I use a separate guide camera and 50mm guide scope for tracking, and this is satisfactory for my purposes (photometry). 280mm f/6.3 (1.76m f.l.) is not typically what people are using for astro photography.

-Ivan

Last edited by lepton3; 02-12-2012 at 10:26 PM. Reason: (f.l. is 1.76m, NOT 17.6m!)
Reply With Quote