View Single Post
  #2  
Old 08-11-2012, 10:12 PM
DavidTrap's Avatar
DavidTrap (David)
Really just a beginner

DavidTrap is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,043
Effective focal length has little to do with it when it comes to astronomy. The Borg at 390mm will have roughly double the magnification compared to your Canon 200mm.

For a given scope, "magnification" will be the same whether you use a small or large chip camera, but you'll see a wider field of view with a larger chip. The resulting image from a smaller chip camera might appear more zoomed in, but that's only because you've blown the image up larger to fill your screen/print vs the image from a larger chip.

If the math were correct, a longer focal length scope with a larger chip will give the same image as a shorter focal length scope with a small chip, but there will be less detail with the latter combination - eg. and FSQ-106 and ST-11000 might give a similar field of view to an FS-60 and a ST-8300, but the former will give a more detailed image through greater magnification.

Hope this helps!

DT
Reply With Quote