[barx1963 (Malcolm)]

Hi William
Both scopes are excellent value for money. I have a GSO dob that is essentially the same as the Bintel one.
Points to consider are:
The finder. The Meade uses a single power reticle finder of which I am not a big fan, others like them but a 8x50 RA finder I think is a better option.
Collimation. Solid tubes still need to have it checked each time it is used. It is easy once you have the hang of it and should not put anyone off buying a truss tube.
The accessories. You get 3 EPs with the Bintel. That said you will mostly use the lower power one anyway and the higher power ones are only average so, again shouldn't be a major factor.
Portability. The Meade will win hands down. A 12" solid tube is a difficult thing to maneuver.
Mechanics. The GSO/Bintel altitude arrangement is excellent. Easily adjustable for different weight and balance configurations. I believe both use a similar arrangment for the azimuth motion. The collimation springs in the GSO/Bintel scopes have always been a little under strength. Not sure about the Meade, but I would assume they would be the same.
Optics. They are identical as far as I am aware.

Overall, IMO portability is the only strong factor separating the 2 scopes. The big question is are you prepared to pay the price premium for portability.

Oh and one other thing. Regarding collimation. Don't fall into the "I have a laser collimator so thats all I need" trap. Good collimation involves a lot more and a laser is only part of the process and not necessarilly and essential one.

Malcolm