|
foreign ownership
Selling off the farm is a travesty. 100 year lease is what has been done in the past overseas, but freehold is tantamount to selling one's own sovereignty. Do bear in mind that the produce shipped back to China does not get taxed, so there is no economic benefit, just a little short term injection of cash(hey, where our governments when you need them-I thought they were supposed to work for us.) Are we so pathetically poor we have to sell ourselves out to a nation not renowned for its human rights just for a little short term cash? And what is the story-we give aid to China for them to then use it to buy the sovereign land of Australia? Why don't we just cut out the middleman and just GIVE Australia to China( oh,poor underprivliged China, boo-hoo). The whole notion of any foreign entities buying up sovereign land to ship the produce offshore without paying taxes or contributing economically to the host land is patently ABSURD.
Do note a conundrum here. The UN expressly declares this sort of activity as unacceptable on one hand, but calls for one world government(with unelected leaders) on the other. Our government is of the opinion that this activity of selling out and giving aid galore(with borrowed money) will curry favour with the UN for that coverted seat on the Security Council. I suggest all IIS readers and anyone who cares about Australian sovereignty and rights to self determination to check out (UN) Agenda 21 and UNIDO(aka Lima Declaration.)
As for wind farms, they are hopelessly inefficient. They only become viable with subsidies. A large cost of wind farms is their decomissioning when they finally break down. Fat chance of China doing the right thing here and properly decomissioning and disposing of the defunct wind farms.
The world is going insane .
|