View Single Post
  #6  
Old 16-09-2012, 07:37 AM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Hi Rex. I like this area too. It's a challenge. There is a lot of detail to be strained out. However, I have found that the expansive reflection nebula and dust fields tend to show up acquisition issues too readily. Particularly, if images are not adequately offset one from the other.

I found this very useful in my attempts at Rho Oph - Berry and Burnell in their Handbook of Astronomical Image Processing recommend spacing images by 10 or 12 pixels - dithering. This is not the super accurate dither technique used by high end/scientific gear, just a crude but very effective way of avoiding multiplying the effects of artifacts across the sensor - reducing noise, increasing SNR, improving flat fielding, sub pixel sampling and so on.


Not all gear is set up to dither - it can be as basic as pausing guiding/tracking for a few seconds between images.
Reply With Quote