View Single Post
  #7  
Old 22-08-2012, 12:15 PM
Garbz (Chris)
Registered User

Garbz is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 646
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
That looks like field rotation from the guide star being too far
from the main frame & the drift alignmment out - strange?
Doubt it's field rotation as I see the same effect in my 10 second test shot I did while making sure the scope was pointed in the right patch of sky.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ross G View Post
Nice photo Chris.

Great detail.

Ross.
Thanks Ross.

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Fitz-Henr View Post
I have found that field flatteners are quite sensitive to the separation between the imaging chip and camera. It does not appear to be field rotation as the off-centre stars are most definitely out of focus compared to the central region. If possible do some tests with varying distances between the flattener and the camera. Here is a link to my pbase site showing some tests that I did with a Newtonian / Paracorr showing significant improvement when the optimal separation is determined: http://www.pbase.com/david_fitz_henry/image/124811410
Interesting. I'll see if I can rig up something to let me adjust the spacing from the camera to the scope. At the moment I have only a fixed adapter for the Celestron C8 which is designed for use without a field flattener. Mind you even without it I still get a similar image. Think it's time for a trip to the hardware store.
Reply With Quote