View Single Post
  #6  
Old 21-08-2012, 05:23 PM
LAW (Murphy)
Registered User

LAW is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 204
It looks to me like detail is preserved in areas where there is less field rotation or less data (the centre, east/west ecliptic and the edges with less stacked frames). This leads me to believe that DSS is overcompensating for field rotation (presuming you're using an Alt-Az mount?)

Depending on how many frames you stacked I'd try doing them in batches of 5. I've only used DSS a few times so I can't remember if there's a specific setting for field rotation compensation?
Reply With Quote