View Single Post
  #17  
Old 14-08-2012, 11:22 AM
Astro_Bot's Avatar
Astro_Bot
Registered User

Astro_Bot is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,605
Sorry, I should have explained ... my existing scope is an 8" Mak-Cass, f/12.3, FL 2500mm. But I'm thinking of selling and getting something more versatile ... maybe an 8"/9.25" SCT that'll take a focal reducer, or maybe an RC8". I'm not going to rush into that decision, though ... I hope.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
Also a large imaging sensor used for deep sky is not optimal for planets. Not that it can't be done, but there's better ways to do it.
I didn't know that. I thought more pixels would produce a better image? Or is it that the pixel density that works on DSOs isn't high enough to get good resolution on planets? Or am I way off?

Why is that, if you don't mind me asking?

Last edited by Astro_Bot; 14-08-2012 at 12:07 PM. Reason: Explained question a bit better
Reply With Quote