http://www.smh.com.au/environment/cl...730-23769.html
I suppose I should be impressed that a 'sceptic' has been able to change his mind based on evidence, however I still find it a little depressing that:
a) an apparently qualified person still doesn't seem to appreciate the level of certainty in the underlying science of the greenhouse effect (as opposed to the difficult process of measuring a weak signal in a lot of noise); and
b) judging from the comments, most of the nutters will resolutely stay on message.
Oh well.