View Single Post
  #1  
Old 10-07-2012, 07:16 PM
Garbz (Chris)
Registered User

Garbz is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 646
Poor polar alignment + 3 star calibration + time

With all these cloudy skies about all I can do at the moment is think about using my telescope which has led me to an interesting thought and quite possibly a realisation that I may have been doing things wrong and making matters worse rather than better....

My polar alignment isn't spot on, it's good, but not spot on. Definitely good enough to get a decent guided session going without visible field rotation over a few minutes, so I'm not really having a problem imaging (except for the aforementioned crappy clouds).

What I was thinking is if you do the following:
  1. Setup telescope
  2. Don't 100% accurately polar align
  3. Do a 3 star alignment.
  4. Go to dinner, read a manual, try find something interesting in a star atlas, etc. Something that takes more than just a minute.
  5. Slew to somewhere else, and .... you can't find your star.
  6. Find your star and add it as another alignment star in EQMOD.
Now. Is the model of my sky distorted? I ask because I've had this issue recently which resulted in me not being able to accurately slew to any of the objects I was looking for even if they were part of the original 3 star alignment.



Does this make sense? If my polar alignment isn't spot on I should basically leave no time between doing a 3-star alignment and slewing to my target if I hope to find it right? Obviously the correct answer is to do a proper drift alignment before I do anything fancy, but my train of thought is correct isn't it?
Reply With Quote