Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ving
isnt it afocal dennis? i dont knoe these terms confuse me 
look better than my first shot of said planet |
Thanks Ving - you are correct. I suspect the imaging train was something like objective -> eyepiece -> camera lens -> sensor, making it afocal.
Eyepiece projection is minus the camera lens thus, objective -> eyepiece -> sensor.
If Josh is as excited as I was when I captured my first ever planetary image of Jupiter, he'll love sharing it with family and friends.
Cheers
Dennis