Quote:
|
Originally Posted by davidpretorius
here u are glenn, not quite finished, 6 or more so to go, but the times are shown so you may be able to work it out from there.date 16th january
|
David,
These are great images and have shown exactly what I was looking for. Based on your images the GRS might have transited 3-5 mins later than the predicted 3.29pm EST I had expected (based on long 103°). That's really not much when you consider its angular size.
Thanks
Glenn