View Single Post
  #30  
Old 26-05-2012, 09:03 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
I'm definitely getting tighter stars and more detail in the galaxy itself from the deconv. The hard part is knowing how far to push it. I often look back at my efforts afterwards and think, "hmmm... I sharpened/denoised/saturated/whatevered that just a bit too much"

Yes that is the trick.

I usually use 40 iterations or less in CCDstack positive constraint.

Basically Ken's technique is to do several versions at higher and low levels and then combine them in Photoshop as you see fit.

I believe how much decon you can use also depends on the image. A dim image will not take much but one that is stong will take more.

I judge by the star shapes. But if you want detail in the galaxy you could just judge the galaxy only, not worry about deformed stars and then blend in the galaxy sharpening only in a masked layer in Photoshop.

How you do all this in PI I don't know.

Greg.
Reply With Quote