Zaps you are making this very easy for me to prove that you do not know what your talking about and furthermore to the situation are inadept at comprehension and reading. For your sake please go back to my posts and read what i said without letting your brain cloud what it is that you think you are reading.
You hear stung egos at work. No. I have mearly proven to you in a mathamatical form (yes nearly all science is mathmatically based) that the flexure and "Vibration" that you are supposedly quoting as gospil does not exist. This you cannot accept and persue to see if im actually telling you truth.
You are just quoting from what you think is truth, be it read on a forum somewhere, or a magazine. I have known my university lectuers to get it very very wrong!
Basics 101 of research do not pin all your tails on the same donkey! Its bound to buck you off at the most in oppertune moment.
We are not saying that the top adjustment plate does not increase the complexity of the mounting system because it does. What Peter and I are asking is does it actually make a difference to the end result. To which my reply is if done correctly NO IT DOES NOT, I stand by this 100% untill somebody can show me other wise. If you put a few piss ant bolts there yeah it will matter. If you don't know what your doing, yes it will matter.
So please Zaps before you post again stop breath think and formulate a logical response with some proof, theory or something other than i told you so.
This thread is about proofs and peer review to get the truth not just another arm chair expert/engineer i think this is what it means, if you want one of them go elsewhere!
B. Mitchell
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zaps
These rat cage things are totally unnecessary for EQ mount users, so why use them? Especially since they weaken the entire footer-to-optics system. Why willingly introduce that weak link? Because others misguidedly do so? I hear stung egos at work.
|