View Single Post
  #11  
Old 22-04-2012, 03:32 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,168
Terry,

I just googled geometric quantum efficiency which is as I recall what Sony use.

Here it is:

http://books.google.com.au/books?id=...ciency&f=false

Translation:

You multiply QE by the sensor ability to cover the surface of the chip (fill factor - how much of a gap between pixels?).

I assume fill factor is a number greater than 1 hence the high QE numbers Sony presents. Although fill factor you would think would be a number less than 1 (1 being the whole area??). Otherwise the QE would be much greater than 77% and that would put it up with an ST10. Unlikely or the Sony chipped cameras would be leaving the Kodak ones for dead in astrophotography and they aren't.

Anyway I suspect its a marketing ploy using definitions that present your product in a better than normal way.

Greg.
Reply With Quote