View Single Post
  #2  
Old 09-03-2012, 10:09 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
I think that's a good call Bert. I use 5nm Ha and with my CDK17 I find I get moon effects still. Also a bright spot but thats the CDK style optics.

3nm Ha no doubt would go a long way to rectifying that. But as the article points out you would need the N11 to make up for the lost signal.

If you are imaging from a light polluted location 3nm Ha makes a lot of sense with fast optics that make up for the increased exposure time needed with 3nm.

Greg.
Reply With Quote