View Single Post
  #5  
Old 01-03-2012, 10:25 PM
Allan_L's Avatar
Allan_L (Allan)
Member > 10year club

Allan_L is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central Coast NSW
Posts: 3,339
I had a Celestron CPC1100 for three years and my viewing mate had a Meade 10" (not sure what flavour).

Everyone who saw both (I believe) thatoght the optics on ths Celestron were superior.
I think the Meade weighs a little more, but they are both a bit hefty.
Having said that I found the Celestron very quick and easy to set up (and I am sure the Meade was just as easy, if a little heavier).
However, the 12inch Meade is getting a little too heavy for one person.

If you want to add a wedge, thats a different story.
I was warned off doing that so I never tried, but I hear it is difficult.

The Celestron had very good mirror stability, in that moving the focuser did not move the image out of centre FOV. I understand this is not the case with Meade. And what I have seen confirms this. So much so that they need a "mirror lock" to avoid mirror flop, which is something I never experienced with the CPC1100 (even under high magnification).

One area the Meade does shine in (IMHO) is in the Hand Controller and Menu system. I found the Celestron menu system a little cumbersome and not as easy to navigate as the Meade. But you get used to it.

My money is on the Celestron.
(But maybe I was just lucky)
Reply With Quote