Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidTrap
I think RAW may have advantages, but if I shoot RAW with my new camera, the resulting data will kill me in post processing (40Mb files x 1000+ shots a night = way too much data)
|
Hi David, the first step I use is to
cull the data. Camera raw is very good for this. You modify one file then develop the rest of the data with the same settings and save to TIFF or Max quality JPEG on disk. RAW gives you the full dynamic range and you're less likely to clip your data so if you can, it's best to use RAW at the source.