I think JCU should be very concerned that this person was able to obtain a BSc. His argument is shallow and ill conceived and he exhibits profound historical ignorance. He also cannot construct a grammatically correct English sentence and his expression is so poor that his meaning is frequently garbled or lost completely. If I were to receive an essay of this quality, particularly from a third year student, that student would not pass the assessment. The quality of his contribution gives the lie to his assertion that "Sober = clear thinking", or was he drunk at the time?
