View Single Post
  #13  
Old 07-02-2012, 10:18 AM
DJ N
Registered User

DJ N is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter.M View Post
I have found that with my F4 newt collimation wasnt too much of a problem, get a good set of tools and you are set. The main thing that I would be thinking about is guiding/vignetting. With my rolled steel tube I found that guiding had alot of flexture involved, the futher your focuser is away from the guidescope the greater the problem as the steel tube flexes signifigantly. I decided on going for an OAG because it seemed to be the best option completely negating diff flex. This caused different problems, I decided to go with a large format OAG because the 9mm varients I had seen cast a shadow on the chip, which was not something that I wanted. I then did not have signifigant backfocus to use the larger OAG. The other problem I encountered is the more you have hanging off the tube the larger the secondary you theoretically need. This is less of a problem with slower scopes because the light cone is less sharp, what I mean here is the parralel light rays that enter the scope are bent in towards the focal plane at a greater angle the faster the scope. So the more of the cone you have in the focuser the wider the secondary and everything after it needs to be.

I have now moved the mirror up the tube to increase backfocus and I can get the camera and guider to focus. I am yet to produce an image as the weather has been ****house but I will post what It looks like as soon as i give it a crack.

I would be interested in seeing what one of these running a guidescope could do If all of the flexture problems were dealt with. If you were thinking of using an OAG with the system I would wonder if the extra price for the carbon fiber would be worth it, I would much rather deal with steel for modifications and with an OAG the expanding and contracting of the tube should not cause too many problems.

Thanks for the reply Peter. You have made some very interesting points. Initially I was expecting to use a separate guide scope (ED80) with the though of going down the path of an OAG. However, this does seem a bit of a hit and miss affair. And as you pointed out, once you have a coma corrector, OAG, guide camera plus CCD hanging off "non-centrally", this opens up a new can of worms.
Reply With Quote