Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
That's a fine image of the Rosette Mark, nice work.
55+ hours  I think that may be a record for one frame without combining several scopes or archived data on IIS, anyone gone longer? Not sure it was really necessary but if you can, heck, why not?
Personally I'm too not fussed on the diffraction spikes, they look fake, I would suggest making them much thinner and more subtle
You must be wrapped with the new Observatory when you can do this sort of project
Mike
|
Thanks Mike!
The diffraction spikes were kind of an after thought, but I quite like them.
I will see if I can make them look more natural.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prokyon
Very nice Mark! Especially the colors are great.
|
Thanks Mate!
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW
Nice but a) drop diffraction spikes b) tone down green c) change the attachment to the Rosette
also one of the major stars in the Rosette cluster is yellow
Cheers
|
Trevor,
Thanks for the feedback!
Oh and d) read entire post before making comments!
The attachment is in relation to the text part of the post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mill
Nice picture Mark 
One tip though, if you have or can get a HA filter i would use that for the Rosette to catch it in a lot less time 
|
Thanks Martin,
I do have the full NB set, and yes that will be on my next thing to do list.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LightningNZ
I would have thought that for 55 hours of exposure you'd see dust everywhere?
Cheers,
Cam
|
Cam,
55 hours sounds long, but given the subs were 30 mins each, thats only 20 or so subs per channel.
I also used 5 minute subs to bring out the star colours, but even at 5 minutes the bright ones are saturated.
Mark