View Single Post
  #10  
Old 29-01-2012, 12:33 PM
wysiwyg's Avatar
wysiwyg (Mark)
Astrophotographer

wysiwyg is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
That's a fine image of the Rosette Mark, nice work.

55+ hours I think that may be a record for one frame without combining several scopes or archived data on IIS, anyone gone longer? Not sure it was really necessary but if you can, heck, why not?

Personally I'm too not fussed on the diffraction spikes, they look fake, I would suggest making them much thinner and more subtle

You must be wrapped with the new Observatory when you can do this sort of project

Mike
Thanks Mike!
The diffraction spikes were kind of an after thought, but I quite like them.
I will see if I can make them look more natural.

Quote:
Originally Posted by prokyon View Post
Very nice Mark! Especially the colors are great.
Thanks Mate!

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
Nice but a) drop diffraction spikes b) tone down green c) change the attachment to the Rosette

also one of the major stars in the Rosette cluster is yellow

Cheers
Trevor,
Thanks for the feedback!
Oh and d) read entire post before making comments!

The attachment is in relation to the text part of the post


Quote:
Originally Posted by mill View Post
Nice picture Mark
One tip though, if you have or can get a HA filter i would use that for the Rosette to catch it in a lot less time
Thanks Martin,
I do have the full NB set, and yes that will be on my next thing to do list.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LightningNZ View Post
I would have thought that for 55 hours of exposure you'd see dust everywhere?

Cheers,
Cam
Cam,

55 hours sounds long, but given the subs were 30 mins each, thats only 20 or so subs per channel.
I also used 5 minute subs to bring out the star colours, but even at 5 minutes the bright ones are saturated.

Mark
Reply With Quote