View Single Post
  #23  
Old 16-01-2012, 02:32 AM
cventer's Avatar
cventer
Registered User

cventer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 957
Marcus not sure but if the graph you posted below. (ie first picture) is RAW uncorrected PE then your mount is well within SPEC.

Looking at that graph the fitted curve stays within 2 pixels either side. The overal scale is 3.7 but you can see all your data is within first 2 lines of graph either side. Each line is 1 pixel. So your data is all within 4 pixels. At 1.29 arc sec per pixel x 4 pixels this puts your PE at 5.16



Quote:
Originally Posted by Mighty_oz View Post
raw data pec shows 4.1 to 4.1, corrected 3.3 to 3.3 not good, waiting for better nights To top that off neither my DSI II pro or the QHY5 guiders work with this mount for me, they connect but don't work properly. I've tried a 258 t-point model asa well for protrack hoping i could take 10 min + unguided images. ROFL as iff ! it's better without protrack than with !
Anyways mustn't ramble on anothers posting
Reply With Quote