View Single Post
  #19  
Old 01-01-2012, 07:14 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
A comparison of two stack methods on the same data.

My usual QHY8 routine is:

1. subtract the darks (mono raw darks from mono raw frames)
2. debayer the calibrated frames (7.8x7.8 pixels, 1x1 grid)...back to colour
3. stack using translation /rotation (just in case something rotated)

4. crop to remove things that throw off the histogram
5. a gentle 1st curve ending linearly.
6. aggressive/moderate curve to suit seeing/data quality
7. colour adjustment/colour background adjustment.
8. sharpening to suit stars/ nebulosity (in layers if necessary.)

This time I used everything in the list except the rotate,
used fine star align ,and I resampled the debayered data before the stack.
It seems to have got better stars and nucleus on even a bad
data set (this was only 26 frames)
Some of my better sets were before twilight with 100frame sets .

I keep saying it...there is SO much in even mediocre data!

Steve
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (stack_methods_c.jpg)
198.7 KB16 views
Reply With Quote