this is why i do not think i have captured it:
quote Iceman in relation to Dennis sharp capture
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/a...achmentid=8129
"The encke division is a very small feature, it hasn't been captured in Dennis's image (as fine as it is).
The image scale needs to be much larger to capture such a small feature. What most people see in amateur images is what has been called "the ghost of encke", which is really a processing artifact from sharpening.
There's a very fine article on it here:
http://www.astro-imaging.de/astro/ghost_of_encke.html"