So very interesting
.
You guys sum so much up I wish I could say.
Craig it is hard to hold facts in your hand and not want to build something with them.. I think of them as blocks that can be rearranged to build various outcomes and not to become too focused on one outcome as the only possibility.
Those who present their ideas on a matter have an audience because they are leaders in their field and their arguements will be supportive of their take on the world er universe ... ideas often have support that makes them difficult to roll but they still may not have assembled their facts to resemble nature.
AND so I wish to introduce the concept of gut feel
... what do you do if your gut tells you.."this is just plain wrong" (on occassion where all knowledge accepts your rejected premise)
... there will be those who need to gaurd the current paridim but there must be those that question it. AND each side must respect the need for the other.
Our sophistication can prove our enemy if speculation with facts is eliminated
.
AND is there common sence
I am for strict review it breeds a stronger beast.
alex