Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigS
Steven;
An interesting and I thought, well balanced discussion about an issue which plagues modern day science and scientists everywhere. The piece is particularly relevant to the current OPERA FTL neutrino experiment (for eg).
One additional thought I've had lately, which I think has not been quite so prevalent in the past is the consideration of the pressure certain teams (or individual) scientists face nowadays, especially with them having such immediate access to ways of influencing public opinion (probably as a direct result of web-based comms). There is an upside and a downside of this two-edged sword but clearly, it calls for much greater rigour in scientific research and accuracy of statements upon concluding a research activity. Wording of findings is crucial and really must lead the way to further investigation.
|
Hi Craig,
When it comes to releasing information to the press, frankly science is in a no win situation. The OPERA FTL neutrino experiment is a case in point. The results should never have been released to the press without further testing and peer review. Now we have the premature headlines "Einstein is wrong" or "Physics is in tatters".
If the other hand the results were not officially released to the press until the retesting or peer review process occurred the delay would be reported as "Neutrinogate" or "Scientists cover up results to protect Einstein".
Remember the press beatup over "Climategate".
Imagine the fodder this would provide to every pseudoscience supporter out there.
Regards
Steven