View Single Post
  #65  
Old 16-11-2011, 02:06 PM
clive milne
Registered User

clive milne is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Freo WA
Posts: 1,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moon View Post
Clive
I can't see anything here that questions Dave design work.
James
Quote:
At this point I am unable to recommend the Rowe Coma corrector. It is incredibly (excessively?) sensitive to collimation.
Quote:
Imaging with cheap newts
seems very problematical, and I guess you get what you pay for.....
Quote:
I haven't posted copies of images since there is nothing to really show off..... Buyer beware.
Quote:
Return the Rowe coma corrector. I have one and it does not perform to
specifications
Quote:
A sign of their problems is that they are regularly coming up for sale
secondhand. I just wasted $200.....

Buyer beware.
Hi James, it might be argued that the criticism is not aimed at Dave Rowe
directly, but it seems to me to be quite plain, all be it implicit.
Note that the criticism is directed at the Rowe corrector, and yet in the
same thread we see an advocation of the MPCC produced by the same manufacturer (presumably under the same roof)
Reply With Quote