[Dennis]

I did not see the documentary but a few observations and initial questions spring to mind as follows:

I work at an air force base where we also get day visitors. When airplanes visit, it is often quite surprising how different people describe each airplane. Some people say that they saw a 2 engine airplane land when in fact a 4 engine platform landed. There is often quite a significant variation in the reported colour schemes and markings of airplanes as described by different people, along with differing descriptions of the external configuration of what they were carrying.

How much explosive stuff would it take to pack these buildings and then wire them? Didn’t some terror group pack a van with explosives in the late 90’s and try to demolish one of the towers?

Air traffic movements appear to be a highly regulated global activity. There are countless people, systems and operational processes and procedures that govern air traffic movements. It seems hard to believe that these could be manipulated to cause airplanes to “disappear”?

I am aware of triboelectric charging causing (unexpected) explosions in fuel tanks so there may be other “reasons” for seeing explosions prior to impact?

A technique used by the media to discredit someone or something when there is no actual evidence, is to state “Some people say that…blah blah blah” and yes, whilst some people might say that they saw or heard things, given the enormous emotional and mental trauma experienced, how reliable is their recall? How many were there? What expertise did they have?

To orchestrate these alleged conspiracy events, ranging from military aircraft being used, the disappearance of the commercial flights, the laying of explosives, the fooling of air traffic control systems and people, etc., does seem somewhat far fetched, requiring the involvement of so many? If such cataclysmic and public events could be so carefully planned and executed in secrecy, with no dress rehearsals, the people in charge must be extraordinary planners, project managers and psychologists?

The above comments are made in complete ignorance of the contents of the program and do not address the other points posted by IIS members. This is such a challenging topic that warrants careful investigation. The consequences of truth in some or all of the points the program appears to have raised are quite dire to say the least.

Cheers

Dennis