View Single Post
  #7  
Old 31-10-2011, 09:24 PM
MikeyB's Avatar
MikeyB (Michael)
Registered User

MikeyB is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 760
Answers to queries

Quote:
Originally Posted by rayone View Post
Did you notice any CA with the 18x50's? Both the 12's and 15's exhibit a little... it's very slight but it present.
Same for the 18x

Quote:
Did you measure the close focus distance?
I don't take any interest in close focussing with conventional binos - too much eyestrain, my eyeballs need recollimating afterwards! I use 6.5x Pentax Papilios when I'm in the field chasing orchids, fungi, butterflies and other close targets: perfect.

Quote:
I don't understand why the 18's are ~ 15% more expensive, when it appears there should be no difference in manufacturing expense.
I believe the 18x and 15x are physically identical apart from the eyepiece magnification factor - you're right, nothing realistically justifies the surcharge.

Quote:
Looking at Jupiter, were you able to discern any bands?
We've still got a couple months before Saturn is visible again... did you happen to look at it with the 18's?
No Jupiter bands - my aging eyes aren't that good and Saturn just looked like a mis-shapen small yellow blob to me.
Reply With Quote