View Single Post
  #3  
Old 23-10-2011, 12:27 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Yes I do:


TEC110FL
http://upload.pbase.com/gregbradley/...9061080/medium small
http://upload.pbase.com/gregbradley/...39061080/large regular
http://upload.pbase.com/gregbradley/...61080/original large


FSQ106EDX with reducer:
http://www.pbase.com/gregbradley/ima...70533/original FSQ106EDX with STL11 and reducer (in hindisght the image is too magenta
and needs a slight repro to address this).

http://www.pbase.com/gregbradley/image/124811617/large FSQ106EDX with reducer and Proline 16803


Keep in mind there are processing differences and exposure total time differences and location is different.

There are smallish differences which you'd expect from 2 of the absolute finest scopes in their class.

The FSQ is more rugged but heavier. They are both similar sizes - the FSQ a bit shorter I think. The lens coatings look different.
Both are excellent scopes. The FSQ has a reducer which is just the bees knees! Yuri doesn't make reducers but there is an APM one newly out that may work on it. I also have a large Tak FS152 reducer that may work somewhat (it tends to coma in the corners). The FSQ's focuser is stronger. Both are awesome scopes. The FSQ is 4 lenses, the TEC 3 but the flattener has about 3 or 4 lenses in it.

Greg.
Reply With Quote