Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDecepticon
Hi Doug,
A very good image still!
 Did you sell the QHY9?
Regards,
Gray. 
|
Hi Gray, Thanks Mate, No I haven't sold the 9 and don't intend to. I bought the 10 so I have a OSC with reasonable resolving power which will allow me an image during the shorter summer nights. Work is a problem making imaging time short. I will continue to use both.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alchemy
Very similar to 6744, it takes a ridiculous amount of data to get much from it, even then it tends to be monochromatic.
Tough work, but we like a challenge , don't we.
|
Thanks Clive but it does give me something to work on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevec35
Not bad Doug. NGC 300 is quite a tough one to do well as it has a pretty low surface brightness but you are certainly off to a good start with this data.
Cheers
Steve
|
Thanks Steve, Low surface brightness is an understatement. I can usually see my targets with a 30 sec exposure to frame it but this one was just visible at 30 sec and then only at 2X2.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS
Was that taken under dark skies, Doug?
|
Hi Rick. Reasonably dark from my backyard.
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Great result Doug, the noise doesn't bother me really, it has a nice deep galactic look to it with a nice bright glow
Mike
|
Thanks Mike, still a way to go with this one just short on time and weather.
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy
thats because we are photon starved Mike.
great to see how that camera works - did you capture under images plus?
i see you have two different gradients in the image - one green and one red
|
Thanks David, The gradients are something I am yet to get to the bottom of. Seems to be something to do with the way these sony chips are read into the computer. Interesting but still a bit to work out.