View Single Post
  #3  
Old 17-10-2011, 08:04 AM
frolinmod's Avatar
frolinmod
Registered User

frolinmod is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 573
TheSkyX is very different from TheSky6. Now that I'm used to it, I find it much easier to use then TheSky6 with few exceptions.

What made it worth upgrading for me:

1. I purchased directly from Software Bisque and negotiated a Universal License rather than individual licenses when I purchased my Paramount ME. That certainly made it more affordable.

2. Tpoint is much better. It's integrated and straight forward rather than an afterthought. Tpoint itself is also a newer easier to use version with internal improvements.

3. The supermodel feature is wonderful as it takes all the grunt work out of creating a model once you have enough data to feed it.

4. Plate solving works much better though I had to change the defaults in the automated calibration to match the image link defaults to make it work one hundred percent. I think it should ship with them matching, but the Bisque's disagree.

5. The Paramount mount support is better and more straight forward. One good one that I especially like is that synchronization history can be examined and rolled back if need be. That's handy to spot and fix those occasional accidental sync mistakes.

6. The camera, mount and focuser control are better, though I usually have TheSkyX set to use CCDsoft as my camera.

7. I like the Database Add On and have it loaded on my internal hard drive.

8. I control my mount remotely, so the virtual mount display is sometimes handy.

9. TheSkyX interface is more multithreaded.


More importantly, TheSky6 has been retired, is no longer being sold and is no longer being enhanced. It's irrelevant. TheSkyX is the current version.


Some "bad" things about TheSkyX:

1. It's more demanding of cpu and video hardware. It really needs modern hardware to shine. Your video card needs to have good and current OpenGL support. If you're clinging to old hardware, then it may disappoint and frustrate. I have run it on an old 3.2GHZ Pentium acceptably, but I wouldn't want to do that all the time.

2. In order to work properly it needs to be set to run in Administrator mode on Windows 7. Same with CCDsoft.

3. The "follow the mount as I move it around" horizon drawing feature from TheSky6 horizon editor is not present in TheSkyX's horizon editor. But you can bring over your TheSky6 horizon file with only a minor edit in Notepad needed to make it work. So I draw my horizon in TheSky6 and bring it over to TheSkyX.

4. Windows Remote Desktop Connection doesn't support modern versions of OpenGL at all (like OpenGL versions from the current century, literally)! So it's not possible to use many OpenGL features while running over a Windows Remote Desktop connection. This is a stupid Microsoft problem rather than a TheSkyX problem, but because I'm a curmudgeon and because I like remote desktop so much as compared to it's competition, it's a PITA for me.

TheSkyX has been rock solid reliable for me. But my mount (Paramount ME), camera (QSI) and my focuser (Optec) are all supported by TheSkyX and CCDsoft, so I'm not needing to use any ascom drivers. That's probably why it's been so stable for me.

Last edited by frolinmod; 18-10-2011 at 02:49 AM.
Reply With Quote