Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley
Its very good. The thumbnail though doesn't do it any justice. It'd be better to link to the hi-res version.
A good result. A bit short on total exposure so the image looks like its stretched a little bit too hard for the depth of the data. But round stars, nice colour - a lot to be happy with. Dust areas take the most amount of exposure time to get a vibrant deep image without noise.
Greg.
|
Thank you Greg, next time I'll link a less compressed image as first preview.
I agree with you regarding exposing for a longer time, dust gradients toward the sky background should be rendered smoother for a better 3d rendition.