Quote:
Originally Posted by Alchemy
I see you be extended to 4 min subs, stars are almost round there's no obvious errors there, you would get that much out of round due to slight polar error or even a bit of ordinary seeing.
Surprised you couldn't load Tiff files into deepskystacker, although I wonder at cs5 ability to accurately convert the RAW files.
Satisfying to capture yourself things that others are doing. You're in the big league now.
|
Thanks for feed back Clive and jjj,good to get some feed back of the top IIS imagers-so may be I have been getting a bit too nit picky,on myself.Its good to see this makes the 'pass' grade with the elite here.
I felt the seeing was not the best last night-certainly not as good as when I collected data for M45,which I was happy with.Also this is slightly out of focus-which also would show up any egging a little more.?
Will give it a break for awhile-but still will try barlow in guider-making 400 FL-which is very highly regarded F.L for imagers.
Cheers Chris
