Quote:
|
At a minimum, 95% of so called "U.F.O" sightings are mundane objects that the observer is seeing for the first time or in a new or novel way
|
Agreed, Les, although I'd lower the percentage a little myself, but that's just my opinion. That would still leave 5-10% of sighting that not only have defied explanation, but are in need of one. If it can be proffered at all. Even if out of all of them, maybe 1% were of the LGM variety, then that's what they are. The others could be anything you like. But that's still not to say what we'll find. We may find nothing.
However, to be dismissive of what's there is nothing more than sticking your head in the sand and hiding from what's occurring.
Study what's there and then make a decision based on what you find.
You can't ask for nothing more or less.