The 'strawman arguments', which attempt to assert the existence of what is unobjective and independently unverifiable in the first place, and is therefore only supportable by faith-based beliefs or internally inconsistent conjecture … is simply ludicrous within astronomical and scientific communities.
Cheers & Rgds[/QUOTE]
Is not this the dogma for one of the greatest beliefs humans have that can not be mentioend because of TOS rules and is still supported by a large number of people who exist within the scietific community
The mere lack of proof does not in itself negate probability to an open mind.
